Below is a culmination of the Sports Hub’s 2020 NBA Draft preparation and scouting. It features The Big Board 2.0, a breakdown of what each team should do with their first round pick, and an overview of some of the most notable prospects left out of the first round.
Here is the link to The Big Board 2.0 (the final edition). It is recommended to keep it open while reading, as it will be referenced multiple times while analyzing picks.
Without further ado, here is a 2020 NBA Mock Draft, predicated on what teams should actually do and not what teams might do Wednesday night.
Some of the circumstances written about last week have changed, but if Minnesota keeps the pick, Edwards should be their selection. It’s sounding possible that they could be able to move down and still secure him, though. Trading out seems to be even less likely now that Jrue Holiday has been officially moved and Bradley Beal’s availability (or lack thereof) has been made clear. The Magic still could pull off the Aaron Gordon deal, and that might be Minnesota’s best option at the time being.
Similar to Minnesota, things have changed since the above article was published, but if Golden State remains here, Avdija is the best fit. Gordon is another good fit for the Warriors, and Wendell Carter Jr. would be as well. The Warriors moving down just a couple spots makes reaching for a wing like Devin Vassell or Aaron Nesmith less troubling, and picking up someone of Carter Jr.’s potential would be a valuable move.
No.3, Charlotte Hornets: LaMelo Ball, New Zealand
The Hornets seem to (rightfully) covet a big with this pick, but Ball being here is too hard to pass up, even with Onyeka Okongwu on the board.
The need at guard may not be obvious or exist at all, but consider what Charlotte actually has in its current group.
Devonte’ Graham’s breakout season was a nice surprise and earned him some serious Most Improved Player buzz, but it’s likely he is best suited as a potent sixth man off the bench in the league.
Despite a perhaps underrated season in 2019-20, Terry Rozier’s contract is still a disaster, and neither his play or age fits Charlotte’s timeline. Additionally, his free agent deal signed last summer was for just three years. The Hornets have to be thinking about what lies ahead after that deal is up.
In Ball, Charlotte would land a player they can truly feel confident in as their franchise point guard. There are certainly some concerns and dark spots, but Ball’s skill of passing and seeing the court is not just his best attribute, but the best attribute any player in this draft class has. Ball checks the top box of what you want in a point guard, and it’s the reason he finds himself atop the big board.
Ball is a special passer. He’s on a completely different level than his brother Lonzo was coming out of UCLA in 2017, and that’s saying a lot. It’s not just the passes with LaMelo. It’s the ability to see passes before anyone else. He scans the court like a quarterback progressing through his reads.
There’s been few better passers than Ball in recent drafts. Perhaps the scariest part is that his distribution is potentially just half of his game.
Ball’s unselfishness passing occasionally morphed itself toward the other direction. The 18-year-old consistently jacked up bad shots during his time in New Zealand, and played like he was trying to make things harder on himself rather than easier. His persistent dribbling, shot selection and hero-ball mentality doesn’t have to be shuttered in the NBA, but it must be reduced until the efficiency can improve.
If Ball can get threes to fall consistently and become less selfish when scoring, then we have everything people thought Lonzo could be and more on our hands in LaMelo. Lonzo was never going to be someone who got the ball and cooked with it in the NBA, despite certain performances at UCLA. Ball’s got the shot creation skills his brother doesn’t possess, but they’re raw.
The concern is that Charlotte isn’t built up well enough offensively yet to help take some of the load off Ball early. That could create bad habits, and lead to a worst-case scenario of what Ball could be in the NBA. That type of player isn’t a liability though. No one with that good of a passing gene is.
Ball could ultimately be a microcosm for this draft. If everything works out, he’s going to be a star. But there’s a lot to work out, and if a good amount of things don’t, then what’s left?
Ball’s likely the execption to most in this draft. If the rest doesn’t work out, you’re still getting someone who could be a generational passer and will still have a positive impact in the league. If Ball tops out at someone like Rajon Rondo, is that a bad thing? Rondo was a great player, and is still contributing even beyond his prime. The issues are that if Ball doesn’t pop, someone else in this draft will. Nobody really knows who that is going to be.
No.4, Chicago Bulls: Tyrese Maxey, Kentucky
Of guys selected in this mock, Maxey is probably the biggest surprise (Bigger surprises could emerge amongst who is not picked). Here’s an explanation.
Maxey is ranked third on the board. He’s an absolute killer on both ends. He’s an incredible defensive presence given his short stature, using his speed to keep up with practically anyone and his quick arms to get into passing lanes. Even for towering wings, Maxey is a hassle. At just 6’3, he’s switchable 1-3.
Offensively, Maxey’s got what you want in a lead guard and potential No.1 offensive option. He hit big shot after big shot at Kentucky, and has to the poise to keep cool in big moments. He’s got the type of game that could lead a successful team – the hesitations and herky-jerky dribbling allows him to create his own shot effortlessly.
His size is an issue – big wings could swallow him. But his moves are just that good, which enables Maxey to get to the rim instead of pulling-up. We’ve seen defensive-minded wings still not be able to guard smaller 1s and 2s – just ask Boston how they handled Kyle Lowry and Fred VanVleet in the playoffs.
Maxey’s considerably lower on likely every board that exists, and some of those reasons make sense. He’s small. He’s not a knockdown shooter, especially from three. He’s a bit of a ball-hog and takes shots he shouldn’t. To most, he seems to be a boom or bust type player. But there’s a chance he’s actually one of the safer bets in this draft, even if he doesn’t emerge as the star the board projects him to be.
How often are you getting the competitiveness and defense Maxey brings to the table? That’s what Maxey can ultimately fall back on if his size and poor shooting limits his ability as a No. 1 shot-creator. Additionally, his potential as a sixth man is limitless. The energy he brings is undeniable.
The Bulls are in need of a star player. Coby White is solid. Zach Lavine is not. Wendall Carter Jr. needs a serious chance, and he wasn’t ever projected as someone who was going to be a shot-creator at the center position anyways. Lauri Markkanen has battled injuries, is unhappy and hasn’t totally panned out. New GM Arturas Karnisovas has so far been operating the Bulls as if they’re a clean slate – Kris Dunn’s declined option proves that. That means he likely won’t care about Lavine’s starting role, or the fact that the Bulls drafted White last year. Karnisovas also won’t care about the fact that Avdija would be the perfect replacement for Markkanen if he’s available, and that Avdija would be everything the Bulls hoped Markannen would be. Karnisovas is going to take the best player available. Maxey is it.
No.5, Cleveland Cavaliers: Onyeka Okongwu, USC
The Cavaliers should be estatic if Okongwu falls to them here. Almost guaranteed to take a big after selecting guard after guard in previous drafts, Okongwu’s the best big available in this draft.
Written about briefly in Monday’s breakdown of Golden State’s options (linked above), Okongwu is essentially a team inserting a Bam Adebayo-type into their lineup. The two are extremely similar players: switchability and rim protection defensively, intuitive passing and feel offensively, and a developing jump-shot that could lead them to step out to the perimeter someday.
Okongwu may not be the all-around defensive player Adebayo is – his switching isn’t quite there yet. But the athleticism is, and with better instincts he could be an effective 3-5 switcher.
Okongwu has the ability to get to the rim, though he’s not as smooth as Adebayo is creating his own shot. Instead, he could be a dominant and efficient post presence, something that Adebayo doesn’t totally have in his game.
The Cavaliers have washed up veterans in their front-court and need to be looking toward the future. Okongwu fits the timeline of their young guards, and each can help one another. Okongwu’s passing allows the guards to develop their off-ball game a bit, and suddenly, Cleveland’s once dim future would seem much brighter.
No.6, Atlanta Hawks: Killian Hayes, France
The Hawks have put themselves in a position hard to get out of. Their fascination with Trae Young is irreversible at this point, so they must strive to build the best team they can around him, and maximize what he’s good at.
Atlanta has done a good job of this so far. Their mix of youthful wings compliments Young nicely, and Cam Reddish’s late-season improve providing much needed scoring.
But Young is still going to be need more help if Atlanta views him as their franchise. The third-year point guard is best at scoring, and he should solely be geared toward that facet of his game. This means reducing his playmaking and, stoutly put, possibly moving him to shooting guard.
Killian Hayes has perhaps the widest range of outcomes on draft night. Some boards begin with him, others have him in the late-lottery or out of it all together. Ranked sixth on this board, Hayes could be the perfect ladder for Young to hang on. He’s an astute passer in and out of the pick-and-roll, brings length and effort to the defensive side, and plays unselfishly – a vital trait in playing next to Young.
The unselfishness is a little frustrating when he’s without the ball. The three point shooting numbers are bleak, and pairing him with a high-usage guard could make him quite idle when he’s not running the show. But Hayes has upside that few others do in this barren draft, and Atlanta doesn’t have crippling needs aside from giving Young help. Hayes is the player who can do that best at this point in the draft, and his potential is worth the pick.
No.7, Detroit Pistons: Obi Toppin, Dayton
The Pistons should be in best player available mode, especially after moving on from young guard Bruce Brown Sunday morning. Per the board, Toppin is that player.
Toppin is polarizing, and it’s deserved. He’s a destructive force offensively, thanks to his leaping ability out of the pick and roll and his three point shooting on pops. His athleticism allows him to not rely on post-ups to score – he can be effective as a cutter, slasher, and a quick-and-easy bucket guy since his size is just so overpowering.
Defensively is where the questions arise. For all of his athleticism, the lateral quickness and foot speed is practically non-existent. The only players he has a chance against are old school bigs and traditional power forwards – those who are slowly being faded out of the game. Teams are rarely feeding guys in the post anymore, and if they are, it’s because nobody can stop them. Toppin’s not an exception.
The former National College Player of the Year makes sense for Detroit despite his drawbacks because 1) he can be their whole offense for as long as they need him to be 2) Christian Wood’s a free agent and could leave, giving Detroit a need long-term in the front-court 3) Wood, if he stays, can make up for Toppin’s limitations defensively and take some of the pressure off.
No.8, New York Knicks: Tyrese Haliburton, Iowa State
The Knicks could go a variety of routes here, but ultimately, it’s smart for them to take the safe one.
Haliburton’s not as highly rated on the board as he is others, and it’s due to a lack of an elite skill. The No. 1 trait assigned to Haliburton is his intelligence on and off the court, but his passing and decision-making doesn’t totally reflect his IQ. He’s kind of just okay at a bunch of things.
Haliburton projects as a great distributor and a solid defender – particularly off the ball. His longer frame makes him able to guard opponents 1-3, if he can stay on them after receiving the pass. Everything else checks out fine. He’s not a good shooter or shot-creator. He needs to be a better disruptive and locked-in defender. His athleticism is meh.
But New York should be okay with these things. They need to be. The Knicks are on track to rebuild the right way now, and with R.J. Barrett, Kevin Knox and Mitchell Robinson in place, all they lack is a true superstar and a solid point guard. Haliburton takes care of one of those, and New York should be bad enough in 2020-21 to land one of the stars atop next year’s draft class, completing what should be an intriguing lineup nonetheless come 2021-22.
No.9, Washington Wizards: Isaac Okoro, Auburn
Okoro is one of the top players left on the board here and it’s thanks to his destructive defensive presence. He’s a rare mix of someone who’s a switchable, solid defender and a disruptive defender all in the same package. His length allows him to be a viable 1-4 defender, while his long arms poke balls from smaller, shiftier guards.
Okoro’s offense leaves a lot to be desired. The shot just isn’t there, and doesn’t project well either. He’s likely just a slasher and cutter on offense, as his dribble penetration game could get swallowed at the next level. But Okoro’s defense has the chance to be valuable enough to make up for the deficiencies offensively. There are few players like that in basketball. If they exist, they’re locking down the opponent’s best player. That’s likely where we’ll be seeing Okoro for years to come.
Washington could use any defense it can get. The team was horrific last season on that end, and Okoro serves as someone who can help clean up teammates’ mistakes instantly. A lineup of John Wall, Bradley Beal, Rui Hachimera, Okoro and Thomas Bryant makes the Wizards seem a lot better than they might be.
No.10, Phoenix Suns: Aaron Nesmith, Vanderbilt
This might be high, but the Chris Paul trade and Hayes and Haliburton’s drafting shifts Phoenix’s thinking here.
If Hayes or Haliburton is available here Wednesday night, the Suns should pull the plug on one of them (Hayes, preferably). Paul’s trade doesn’t change the need for a long-term point guard, though it shores up the immediate impact that position can bring to the Suns. Paul’s age is no laughing matter though, and there’d be no better mentor than the Point God himself to a young player.
But here, neither are available. Phoenix could reach for another lead distributor, but even though reaches are encouraged in this no-trades mock, better players exist for Phoenix.
Enter Nesmith. The best shooter in this class, Nesmith simply doesn’t miss. He was over 50 percent at Vanderbilt last season, and that was with a heavy offensive workload on a bad team.
He’s a tad limited defneisvly, but Mikal Bridges’ lockdown tenacity on that end can make up for almost all of Phoenix’s wings. Taking Nesmith after drafting Cam Johnson last year might seem redundant, but if Golden State taught us anything, it’s that the more shooters you have, the better.
No.11, San Antonio Spurs: RJ Hampton, New Zealand
The Spurs are similar to the Bulls in that they have some young, intriguing pieces of which none can offer true superstardom in the future. They’re solid almost everywhere, which means they can afford to take a swing or a risk here.
Hampton has an incredibly low floor but a high ceiling. He’s a shot maker and creator, but if he can’t be great at those two things, then there’s nothing else to really get out of him.
He’s a star or he’s not. If he’s not, then the Spurs are fine. If he is, then watch out.
No.12, Sacramento Kings: James Wiseman, Memphis
One of the consensus top prospects in this draft doesn’t receive the same shine here.
Wiseman may be underrated on the board, but it seems as though some teams feel the same way the board does as well. Multiple reports have suggested that certain teams have Okongwu over Wiseman on their boards, and that’s probably the right ranking.
Wiseman’s ranking isn’t suggesting that he’ll be a bust, but it’s more of an overall summary of what he actually is: a rim running and protecting big. It’s as simple as that.
There isn’t much else to it, even though Wiseman may seem to think so. All of the speculation about his offensive game morphing into that of a wing’s is silly when Wiseman will have to face NBA defenders. His rim protection has the chance to be elite, though his skinny frame will need bulk for him to truly contain bigger centers. For someone who moves as fluidly as Wiseman does at his size, the switchability isn’t really there.
So why does a skillset like that warrant a top three pick, even in a bad draft? Perhaps it’s his polarizing nature and a team’s business side playing its hand, but in terms of straight talent, Wiseman takes a backseat to a lot of prospects in this draft.
All of that said, he’s a good fit for the Kings here as one of the top prospects left on the board. Marvin Bagley is a not rim protector, and Sacramento’s backcourt is set.
No.13, New Orleans Pelicans: Devin Vassell, Florida State
New Orleans is ecstatic to land Vassell here, as the sophomore is the classic example of what “solid” looks like in this draft class.
Vassell likely won’t fail in the league. He’s reminiscent of Trevor Ariza – someone who can play good defense and knock down shots on a good team.
His reason for sliding down the board lies in his lack of an elite skill – similar to Haliburton. Vassell’s a good shooter and a good defender. Some feel as though there’s some shot creation skills that could be developed, but it feels like more of a pipe-dream than a reality.
The Pelicans are still looking for a point guard of the future after the Jrue Holiday trade, but drafting a passer here is a bit of a stretch. Taking Vassell gives New Orleans a solid player to add to their core, and makes a (enter point guard)-Vassell-Brandon Ingram-Zion Williamson–Jaxson Hayes lineup extremely scary.
No.14, Boston Celtics: Patrick Williams, Florida State
Seminole teammates go back-t0-back here, and it’s likely Boston would have ended up with one of them regardless.
The Celtics need to fill out their bench, and they can do so by taking the best player available that’s not a point guard. The board says that’s Patrick Williams.
Williams probably won’t make it here, as his stock has risen dramatically in the weeks leading up to Wednesday’s draft. Reports Tuesday night indicated he could be Chicago’s pick at No. 4 overall.
If he’s here, he’d be excellent value for the Celtics. Williams is an imposing defensive presence who’s got a sweet jump-shot for his size. The Celtics love their big, defensive-minded wings and Williams fits the bill.
There’s a lot of potential with him as well – though projecting him into a star is a tough bet. He’s got good shot-creation skills for his size – the wingspan makes jumpers of his impossible to guard. There could also be some untapped potential at center on both ends, though rim protection could be a more likely role as his foot speed won’t match the fastest wings. Williams is simply massive, and could play anywhere from the 2 to the 5 in a given lineup.
Like Maxey, Williams is a safe bet. If he hits a high ceiling, we’re looking at one of the most gifted and versatile players in the league. If not, you’re getting great, strong defense and an unguardable shooter.
No. 15, Orlando Magic: Cole Anthony, North Carolina
Cole Anthony is among the most polarizing players in this draft class. Nobody has fell harder from the preseason draft rankings, and it’s not totally his fault. His injury decimated the Tar Heels’ season, and it seemed as though Anthony himself never fully recovered from it.
There isn’t much tape on Anthony, so teams are resorting to a lot of high school film, which is always an immediate concern.
Anthony’s a scoring point guard, but his size and usage could limit him. He made a lot of bad shots when he played in college, and has the body that could very well get swallowed by wings. There isn’t elite speed or athleticism to make up for it, either.
Anthony is the boom or bust prospect of this class. His shot-making could be as good we think at the next level, but if it isn’t, then we’re looking at an inefficient, undersized player who’s out of the league shortly.
The Magic have a lot of pieces in place, and just need the guy who’s going to make it all come together. Anthony is likely not that, but it’s probably worth the shot at this point in the draft. It wasn’t long ago that we thought Anthony would be in contention for the first overall pick.
No. 16, Houston Rockets: Saddiq Bey, Villanova
With Robert Covington out of the picture, Houston can use the pick they got in return to find his replacement.
Bey’s another one of the safest, most solid picks in this draft. Like Vassell and Williams, you’re getting good defense and good shooting. But Bey’s pedigree at Villanova in addition to his insane frame allows him to truly be a multi-positional defender at the next level.
He’s the perfect Covington hole-filler, and will fit Houston’s system like a glove, assuming it doesn’t change dramatically with James Harden’s trade demand.
No.17, Minnesota Timberwolves: Josh Green, Arizona
The Timberwolves continue to fill out their roster with mostly wings, and they take the best available one here in Arizona’s Josh Green.
A knockdown shooter, Green’s an underrated defender. His thick frame is rare for someone who moves as well as he does, making him not just switchable but strong as well.
The Wolves stealing Green here devastates Dallas, and Minnesota adds another quality wing to a team that could use defense greatly.
No. 18, Dallas Mavericks: Robert Woodward Jr., Mississippi State
The Mavericks simply need two-way players on their roster, making Green’s selection a tough swallow.
Better players than Woodward Jr. exist on the board, but none fit Dallas’ select need.
Woodward is another strong and long wing who can really shoot it while doubling as an off-ball threat in multiple sets. He’s straight firepower and certainly won’t kill Dallas defensively – two traits they desperately need to surround Luka Doncic with.
No.19, Brooklyn Nets: Isaiah Joe, Arkansas
Isaiah Joe was on track to be the best shooter in this draft class until Aaron Nesmith showed up.
Joe’s so ridiculous from the three point line that in 2018-19, his three point percentage topped his field goal percentage – a stat that doesn’t feel like it should be possible.
Additionally, Joe moves like a pinball around the court. He’s constantly fighting through and flying around screens and trying to get open. His effort to shoot it is just as impressive as the shot itself.
Brooklyn is in best player available mode or most tradeable asset mode, depending on how real the smoke around a Harden trade is. If the Nets keep their current team together, Joe would fit right in.
No.20, Miami Heat: Paul Reed, DePaul
Likely another reach, Reed is arguably the most switchable player in the draft. He’s got legitimate chops guarding all positions, which is unbelievable considering his size.
The Heat strictly need Reed to help Bam Adebayo protect the rim. This could be placing a limit on Reed’s ceiling, but it’s also very possible him guarding 1-5 at the NBA level is unfeasible.
Reed doesn’t have a great offensive game, but the Heat are so deep and loaded with offense that they can afford the reach here. Reed gives them what they need.
No.21, Philadelphia 76ers: Jahmi’us Ramsey, Texas Tech
Pinpointing what the Sixers should do here is tough considering their new management and current roster. Splitting the bill seems like the right thing to do.
It seems unlikely that the 76ers are going to make any major moves this offseason, so addressing their needs given what they have is the right approach. Philly could certainly use more shooting and more shot-creators around Ben Simmons and Joel Embiid. Ramsey provides both.
He’s an upside pick, but Ramsey has shot creation chops that could let him develop into a crafty offensive player someday. He’s also a good shooter for how high his usage can run, indicating that Philly could use him and his athleticism off the ball in certain sets.
It’s unlikely, but the Sixers could be looking at their future No. 1 offensive option here, depending on how you value Embiid’s post game. Ramsey has the dog and skill in him to hit that point. He’s a bit boom or bust, though the shooting provides a foundation no matter what he turns out to be.
No.22, Denver Nuggets: Precious Achiuwa, Memphis
Paul Millsap might be a goner in free agency this offseason, and the Nuggets could use more long defenders after watching what the Lakers did to them in the Western Conference Finals. Achiuwa is raw, but the one trait he does bring is energy and athleticism. The dude is long as all hell, and can use his arms to make himself a problem for practically anyone. His offense needs to come a long way, but Denver has not been adverse to risk and swinging for the fences in the draft. Achiuwa’s a bit of a project, but they Denver can let him play and develop him at the same time.
No.23, New York Knicks: Jordan Nwora, Louisville
The Knicks trade-up Wednesday morning is a bit concerning, considering that it was previously thought that they were going to be patient and rebuild the right way.
If they keep the pick, Nwora would be a good choice. After taking Haliburton in the lottery, New York can still fill a hole on the wing. Nwora’s a reach here, but his placement at No. 24 on the board shouldn’t make it a surprise.
Nwora’s got an ideal scoring arsenal. He’s not just a pure shooter, though he’d excel in that role. The 22-year-old was Louisville’s No. 1 offensive option last season, and his tall frame allows him to get buckets over anyone.
He’s comparable to Cam Johnson with a more diverse offensive game. Both have lengthy frames, are older and are a tad stiff defensively, but they shoot the hell out of the ball and likely won’t disappoint.
No. 24, New Orleans Pelicans: Tyrell Terry, Stanford
Terry’s small size is a cause for concern, and the board reflects that. But he’s a dynamic shooter and good passer, making him New Orleans’ perfect long-term point guard as Zion Williamson figures to have the ball in his hands more given a healthy year.
Terry’s slide to being the No. 28 overall prospect in this draft class has to do with his value defensively. He’s going to get relentlessly attacked, and there’s not much he or the Pelicans are going to be able to do about it.
No.25, Oklahoma City Thunder: Elijah Hughes, Syracuse
Oklahoma City is simply in asset acquisition mode. That means they can afford to take swings.
Hughes is the last of his kind in the draft. The 22-year-old was Syracuse’s whole offense last year, and did a pretty job running the show.
Hughes’ workload forced him into a lot of bad situations, but the guy has a knack for getting buckets and beating anyone off-the-dribble. OKC will likely find their star in upcoming drafts, but Hughes isn’t a bad flyer.
No.26, Boston Celtics: Jalen Smith, Maryland
The Knicks’ trade-up with Utah costs the Jazz Smith here, and Boston should be ecstatic.
Boston’s fallen on hard times trying to replace Al Horford. Smith doesn’t offer the same type of game, but he’s a big, modern center who can switch decently well and shoot threes. He’s not the passer Horford was and never will be, but could offer Boston a solution to an immense problem.
No.27, Utah Jazz: Zeke Nnaji, Arizona
Trading back and scooping up a high second round pick gives the Jazz Zeke Nnaji, who isn’t a bad consolation prize to Smith.
Nnaji is arguably more switchable than Smith, as he’s got a more wiry frame and more athleticism. Rudy Gobert’s contract situation and character seems to be limiting his days in Utah, and the Jazz can easily transition to a more modern brand of ball by letting Nnaji takeover when and if Gobert is out the door.
No. 28, Oklahoma City Thunder: Ty-Shon Alexander, Creighton
Once again, Oklahoma City is in best player available mode. Alexander is a sizzling shooter who’s an absolute beast against guards defensively. He’s not super switchable, but is able to lockdown almost anyone playing the 1 and 2 positions while providing shot-making from anywhere on the court.
No.29, Toronto Raptors: Theo Maledon, France
Fred VanVleet’s free agency and Kyle Lowry’s age make Maledon the perfect pick for the Raptors. Maledon is among the safer players in this draft – he plays like a professional, sees the court incredibly well and carries poise with the moves he makes There’s a chance he’s just a backup, but the Raptors need depth at the position in the immediate future.
No.30, Boston Celtics: Cassius Stanley, Duke
Boston finishes filling out their bench by taking another wing. Stanley has rocket-boosters in his shoes, which should help him become a better defensive player than he currently is. But his shooting is undeniable, and the Celtics love for athletic wings makes this a good fit.
Bolmaro is basically jumbo-size Steve Nash.
The Spurs are similar to the Bulls in that they have some young, intriguing pieces of which none can offer true superstardom in the future. They’re solid almost everywhere, which means they can afford to take a swing or a risk here.
Bolmaro has the chance to be that star. At 6’7, he passes like a point guard. He has incredible feel for the game, and looks like a professional at just 19 years old. The guy can get whatever shot he wants, though his modernness needs work (Specifically, catch and shoot threes).
The biggest problem with Bolmaro is that he’s not even a simple draft and stash. Reports have indicated that it could be two years before he makes his NBA debut – which would mean the 2022-23 season would mark his arrival. It’s tough to make a bet on your star when he’s far that far away.
But this is the Spurs, and they’ve been willing to take international players and let them develop before. Bolmaro is the exact type of presence and player they need to maximize their core’s peak. The timing of the two could line up very well.
Now for a breakdown of the most surprising prospects not to go in the first round mock, separated into three tiers.
How did these guys not go in the first round?
- Leandro Bolmaro: The dude is basically jumbo-size Steve Nash, but he’s likely to be overseas until at least 2022, making his value tough to gauge. A further developed jump-shot could make him an unstoppable force offensively. (Note: A previous version of this article had Bolmaro going No. 11 to the Spurs, which left RJ Hampton without a spot in the first round. Apologies for the error).
- Immanuel Quickley: Better shooters just exist. He’ll be a threat off screens and cuts in the league.
- Ashton Hagans: NBA teams just aren’t as high on him. It’s understandable, as he’ll never, ever shoot. But his defensive tenacity and knack for running a team should lead to some success at the next level.
- Peyton Pritchard: An intriguing target for Toronto at No. 29. Maledon just projects as a better distributor. Pritchard’s frame might limit his scoring impact, too.
- Cassius Winston: Here’s another safe pick. It’s just that there is almost zero ceiling with him.
- Isaiah Stewart: Moves really well for how much of a throwback big he is. Is a beast defensively and can guard pick and rolls. Problem is lack of a modern offensive game.
- Malachi Flynn: Just another really solid backup point guard.
Want to like, but…
- Desmond Bane: He doesn’t move his feet well for someone who’s acclaimed defensively. Should be able to hit shots at the next level, but the NBA might be a wakeup call for him on the other end.
- Udoka Azubuike: He’s similar to Stewart but can’t move like him. Injuries really hurt his stock at Kansas. One of those guys you wish was better.
- Tyler Bey: What is there besides insane athleticism? A bit raw.
- Killian Tillie: Tillie would be a guaranteed top 20 pick if his medicals weren’t horrifying. There will likely be teams staying completely away, and it’s purely a shame.
- Yam Madar: Projects as a fourth-guard, where as the Pritchard’s and Maledon’s of the draft can probably be third guards.
- Devon Dotson: Could be a fun scorer but lacks the athleticism needed to do it.
- Kira Lewis: He doesn’t have De’Aaron Fox’s speed or passing ability, which was the reason Fox was able to make up for his lack of shooting out of college. Also might be a tough hang defensively due to his small size. That’s the complete opposite of Fox.
- Grant Riller: Riller is basically the equivalent of someone 6’7 playing basketball against people who are 5’8. He was that much better than everyone else at Charleston, making all the highlight reels hard to really believe in.
- Tre Jones: A great defender but plays way too reckless offensively. Maybe his brother Tyus can teach him some things about settling down.
- Jaden McDaniels: Hard pass. Nobody was more underwhelming in college basketball last year. The tools are there but the execution and effort is not.
- Nico Mannion: If Grant Riller is the 6’7 dude, then Mannion is one of the 5’8 people. He might be able to shoot it and pass at the next level, though his stature is concerning on both ends.
- Aleksej Pokusevski: Another hard pass. He’s the exact type of player you don’t want to fall in love with. He’s not a fluid mover, which is concerning given his ridiculous frame. He’s robotic shooting and dribbling, and will get banged around endlessly.
- Daniel Oturu: Oturu has been dominant since his high school days, but his style of play doesn’t totally fit the modern NBA. He’s been rumored to be shooting it well, but there’s still no switchability or rim protection on the other side.
- Xavier Tillman: No shooting and no rim protection is a bad combination as a big these days.
- Vernon Carey Jr.: Nope. Way too much old-school in his game, and Duke didn’t help modernize him at all this past year.